[♪ PULSING 70s ELECTRONIC MUSIC ♪] It’s not some science fantasy effect from 2001. This electronic display emanating from Australia’s
largest computer is a picture of the condition, past, present and future, of planet Earth. The program was originally devised by a
scientist working from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jay Forrester. It was developed under the auspices of the Club of Rome by an MIT research team to present a complex model of the world and
what we humans are doing to it. The program, called World One, doesn’t
pretend to be a precise forecast. What it does, for the first time in man’s history on
the planet, is to look at the world as one system. It shows that Earth
cannot sustain present population and industrial growth for much
more than a few decades. It shows that simply cleaning up our
car exhausts and making some small effort to limit our
families simply isn’t enough. It’s like an electronic guided tour of
our global behaviour since 1900 and where that behaviour will lead us. Well this is the printed version of what
we’ve just seen on the television screen. And what looks, at first, to be just a maze of computer characteristics is really a system of very
simple graphs which project what’s going to happen to the planet over the
next 150 years if we don’t do something drastic to stop it . Down the left-hand side of the graph is the date 1900, 1940, 1980, 2020, right down to 2060. Now each of these lines of letters represents a
curve showing some aspect of the condition of the planet. The further out
this way they go, the greater that figure is. The further this way the less. For example,
P represents population so here it is at 1900, and then it comes up to 1940,
it starts to take off. Here we are at 1980, up to the turn of the century, and
then it starts to peter off. Let’s now have a look at this next curve, the Q curve, which is the quality of life and this is represented by, for example,
the amount of space people have, the amount of money they have to spend,
the amount of food they have to eat. Now it increases rapidly up to 1940,
but from 1940 on the quality of life diminishes and here we are,
about the turn of the century, and we come up to the year 2020 and
it’s really come right back. More people of course means that
you start to chew up your supply of natural resources, and this
is this curve here, the N curve, that shows that slowly but steadily the pool of
natural wealth in the world; natural resources, minerals, oil and
so on, is slowly but steadily diminishing. So this is the situation – as population
increases, the quality of life decreases, and the supply of natural
resources decreases. But have a look at this curve here. This
is called the Z curve and it represents pollution. Now predictably enough as the population
increases up to 1980, pollution increases. There’s more rubbish. But from 1980
to the year 2020 pollution really takes off. This is assuming of course that
we don’t do anything about it. So the year 2020, the condition of the planet starts to become highly critical and if we don’t do anything about
it this is what’s going to happen. The quality of life is going to go
right back to practically zero. Pollution is going to become so serious,
right out here, that it will start to kill people, So the population will diminish, right back
here, less than it was in the year 1900. And at this stage, round about the
year 2040, 2050, civilised life as we know on this planet will cease to exist. Well hopefully of course it won’t be allowed to
happen, but it’s taken this kind of shock treatment to nudge governments into doing something
and slowly we are. We’re starting to clean up our atmosphere, we’re starting to recycle
our rubbish, we’re doing something positive about population control, but so far our
efforts have really been just a drop in the ocean. The Club of Rome comprises some
70 men of widely varying backgrounds, but their common concern is that the world problems
cannot be solved by individual nations. I spoke with Professor Hugo Thiemann, director
of the Battelle Institute in Geneva, Dr Aurelio Peccei, founder of the club, and
Dr Alexander King, director of the World Bank and the United Nations’ OECD. Dr. King, now you’re describing the world as
a closed system where all these things are interrelated and yet the government, the control of the system, is by individual nation-states. Now how do you convince them to cooperate? The sovereignty of these nations is
no longer as absolute as it was. There’s a gradual diminishing, whittling away of sovereignty, little bit by little bit, especially, of course, the smaller
countries where it’s more obvious, but the bigger countries have to do a good
deal of this by agreeing to international arrangements for the Law of the Seas, or for the limits
of fishing or for control of the wavelengths and radio and a hundred and one other things,
but especially in a technological field I think. This is going to be increasingly so with the developments next year. I was at an important meeting in Washington
a couple of weeks ago and Peterson, the former Secretary of Commerce, was saying the same thing from an economic point of view – that the general world economic situation, the interdependence of countries, on their food and fuels and so on, is leading to an interdependence which has seeds of draining away
of sovereignty within it. So I don’t think one can envisage an idealistic of
jumping to a world federalism or anything of that sort but the building up probably in the next decade in
a number of particularly sensitive fields, like energy, raw materials, the use of the oceans,
space and so on, of a number of what people are tending to call regimes, which will not be
ordinary United Nations-type of organisations but semi-management organisations. There’ll
be a great deal of consent in them. Dr Peccei views the European common market as an elementary example of the kind of regional cooperative which is going to be necessary. What
responsibilities does he see for Australia? You are in a splendid position.
[REPORTER] What should we do? You have food, energy, space. You
are distant from other centres, so you can, for a longer time, feel rather more independent than interdependent. but things of the world are going so fast that I I think that the enlightened leadership in Australia should see down the road that Australia will have to lose some of its own self decisions in order to acquire something else which may be purely political in a very wide sense, or maybe also security. The Club of Rome is reluctant to point the finger at any one nation, yet clearly nations like the United States which consumes approximately 60% of
the world’s resources, will, in the club’s view, have to accept a severe cutback in its voracious
appetite. But the club’s utterances are cloaked in a velvet democracy in the
hope that their facts will gently persuade. We will ask “who is making the decision?”
and whether the decision makers of today whether they perceive the problems, what kind of problems, and the interactions of the problems. That’s a very pragmatic approach. [REPORTER] Has the time come, Dr. King, when we’re going to have to say we can no longer entrust our resources and the exploitation of
those resources to private enterprise? Is the time come when governments
will simply have to take more control? Simple nationalisation and things
like that wouldn’t help at all because we’ve got to keep an incentive
approach and many of the good aspects of private enterprise are very necessary
here, but not in the old exploitative way where the market forces dominated
the whole situation. [REPORTER] Dr Peccei, can you tell me what my lifestyle will be in 100 years’ time? What sort of car I’ll drive, what sort of house
I’ll live in, what sort of food I’ll be eating. Probably you will have a smaller car, you
will use more common transport means, you will work far less hours, you will have
a wider cultural possibility than today, you will not be so much pestered
by immediate needs because through technology, organisation of the markets, the basic needs will be taken care of and I think that you will love nature
and continue then what I think you are doing now to protect our environment,
to avoid this man-made world where the creatures of nature,
the animals, the plants, the green spaces, the wilderness,
is bound to disappear. To the Club of Rome the status symbols of the year 2000 will be the inverse of today’s. Prestige will stem from low consumption.
That personal consumption will have to be less is plain enough, but for that
privation to be seen as prestigious would seem to indicate some radical rethinking,
at least for the fat cats of the planet. [♪ PULSING 70s ELECTRONIC MUSIC FINISHES ♪]

Computer predicts the end of civilisation (1973) | RetroFocus
Tagged on:                                                                                                             

100 thoughts on “Computer predicts the end of civilisation (1973) | RetroFocus

  • April 28, 2019 at 9:36 am
    Permalink

    I'm so glad that they took action back then to preserve our environment. We could be in all sorts of trouble otherwise, whew!

    Reply
  • April 29, 2019 at 12:16 pm
    Permalink

    Oh no! AOC is right, the world will end in 12 years!

    Reply
  • May 1, 2019 at 12:30 am
    Permalink

    "all models are wrong, but some are useful" – George Box.

    This one is surprisingly accurate considering the algorithm was written in the early 70's.

    Reply
  • May 2, 2019 at 9:30 am
    Permalink

    Falls apart after 2020. Bout right

    Reply
  • May 8, 2019 at 8:51 am
    Permalink

    Does anyone noticed that computer even didn't take account on global warming/climate changes at all?

    Reply
  • May 15, 2019 at 5:01 am
    Permalink

    I was 19 when this was shown on ABC Aus, now I'm 65, all I can say is I'm clad I will be dead by 2050!. My parents gen were unaware, my gen was well aware, X was aware, Y was aware, millenniums will be just as negligent, kiss your arse goodby!

    Reply
  • May 15, 2019 at 5:03 am
    Permalink

    Face reality, we only change when we can't find food and shelter.

    Reply
  • May 15, 2019 at 7:36 am
    Permalink

    Some people seem to relish the prospect of social Armageddon.
    Doom and gloom merchants are the real enemy of the common man.

    Reply
  • May 16, 2019 at 3:19 pm
    Permalink

    really accurate but this algoritm didnt take into account global warmig and nuclear war.. so humans life on earth will cease to exists before 2050 maybe

    Reply
  • May 17, 2019 at 5:45 pm
    Permalink

    MIT, CLUB OF ROME THST'S ALL I NEED TO KNO

    Reply
  • May 17, 2019 at 5:48 pm
    Permalink

    The Bots are gonna be running shit.

    Reply
  • May 22, 2019 at 5:58 am
    Permalink

    This computer is wrong!! It would be much sooner than that. Obviously it did not take into account that the American people instead of becoming smarter and more informed they actually become dumber year after year. As a result they will elect the dumbest and most corrupt president ever that thinks global warming is a hoax !! If we don’t wake up and he is RE-elected in 2020 then for sure we will all be doomed so god help us! But even “god” won’t be able to!

    Reply
  • June 1, 2019 at 12:55 am
    Permalink

    we need some bold solutions, and I think they are within our grasp. Clearly, the oligarchy must be neutralized as their solution is to hasten and then harness the downward spiral for their own gain and comfort and ultimately the survival of their own clans.

    Reply
  • June 2, 2019 at 9:14 pm
    Permalink

    We need to let some weird people that we haven’t elected to make decisions. Climate change. It’s f’en simply.

    Reply
  • June 5, 2019 at 12:23 am
    Permalink

    This rules out human ingenuity as a factor for the future. Who knows what science and tech will bring in the next 10 years and beyond.

    Reply
  • June 6, 2019 at 3:23 pm
    Permalink

    I wonder how many people who watch this and come to the conclusion that we must do something radical to stem the downward spiral would really step up to the challenge and just do it. For instance, how many of these same people succumb to the hype and "need" to have the latest smart phone because they feel their phone is obsolete, or their laptops are not the latest and greatest, event though it still functions as well as the first day they bought it, and they buy the newest, or they feel it is too hot or cold in their homes so they adjust the thermostat to make it colder or warmer as the season dictates, it is too far to walk to the grocery, so let us take the car for the 4 blocks, 4 televisions in the home, of course….it is all about conspicuous consumption. It has become so ubiquitous that we don't even see it anymore. How about all the plastic bottles and containers? In my day we had to bring an empty bottle when we bought beer, sodas, or milk and if we did not we had to pay the deposit on the bottle that we would then get back when we returned it. Not today, we see all these plastic containers in landfills and alongside the roadways. Get back to conservation of resources and glass. The only reason we do not is because the producers don't want it and they have the money to sway the law makers.
    Population growth? Government is complicit in this because those with education and resources are having fewer and fewer children but those with the least resources, financial and intellectual are contributing to the population growth in numbers that are not keeping with their percentage of the population….because government incentives in the form of free health care, maternity care, child care and added financial benefits that are a form of positive reinforcement for the negative behavior. I am speaking not from a moral standpoint but simply from one of recognizing that we can not continue adding population that is unable to adequately provide for themselves and consume in numbers that drain government resources.
    It will take a substantial change in lifestyle to begin and stem the downward spiral and it truth it will result in a different, albeit a better quality of life. Take it from someone who grew up without air conditioning, no home phone, did a lot of walking and bicycling, carried bottles to the grocery when buying items that came in glass bottles, took public transportation when going anywhere too far to walk or ride a bike, hung clothing on the clothes line to dry….yes it may sound like the "dark ages" but it was sustainable for so much longer than the current form of living will result it.

    Reply
  • June 11, 2019 at 2:46 am
    Permalink

    Ron Geesin – Organ in the Clouds

    Reply
  • June 11, 2019 at 3:50 pm
    Permalink

    And yet they are just starting to talk about it seriously… amazing how a couple 1% doomed the rest of us . Very sad .

    Reply
  • June 12, 2019 at 5:14 pm
    Permalink

    over population.
    its like a fish bowl too many fish it fill with poo

    Reply
  • June 13, 2019 at 5:37 am
    Permalink

    It is true that we need to take better care of the planet, but is government outreach really needed?

    Reply
  • June 19, 2019 at 8:26 am
    Permalink

    And yet Trump still denies it all. America is doomed.

    Reply
  • June 22, 2019 at 3:00 am
    Permalink

    Sometimes, I almost totally forget that there was once a time where a computer's performance capabilities could be inferred from how physically large it was.

    Reply
  • June 22, 2019 at 3:33 am
    Permalink

    MEMO

    TO: EVERYONE TOTALLY TRIPPIN' ABOUT HOW WE'RE ALL, LIKE, TOTALLY DOOMED, AND WHAT-NOT

    FROM: ME

    SUBJECT: CHILL THE EFF OUT ALREADY

    The trouble with trying to forecast the future, whether it has to do with ecology, social trends, evolution, climate science, et al, is that doing so typically involves trying to reconcile a staggering number of variables accurately, many of which we might not account for because they don't exist yet, or they *do* exist and we just haven't figured them out yet.

    And even if that can be done, applying static reasoning– that is, assuming that current trends will continue playing out exactly as they have been/totally unchanged into the foreseeable future — renders them quickly meaningless because that's not how things work. Never have, never will. I'm old enough to remember how back in the '70s, the same sort of people who were insisting that our ecologically-irresponsible behavior was going to cause a catastrophic drop in global temperatures are now insisting we're going to boil away for the same reasons.

    Once upon a time, the whaling industry was something akin to the modern fossil fuel/petrochemical industry. Whales were big business, because whale products had myriad uses; whale oil, whale bone, whale ivory, whale blubber, even whale barf were in high demand. The whale population, quite predictably, took a big hit. Whale products became increasingly scarce and expensive. Were whales hunted to extinction? No. Was everything that used whale products abandoned? No. Industry stepped in and invented plastics, polymers, synthetic fuels, cellulose, and such.

    Reply
  • June 24, 2019 at 8:56 am
    Permalink

    NWO incoming

    Reply
  • June 24, 2019 at 7:43 pm
    Permalink

    Eerily accurate.

    Reply
  • June 25, 2019 at 2:50 pm
    Permalink

    The talk of Global Communism starts @ 8:15 mark.

    Reply
  • June 27, 2019 at 7:38 pm
    Permalink

    Club of Rome eh? Founded by the following three men; David rockefeller, a banker who financed the oil industry, Alexander King, a pioneer in the use of DDT as a pesticide, and Aurelio Peccei, founder of italian airline company Alitalia and also Fiat. NONE of these men have a vested interest in environmental stability. It's all propaganda, there is no global warming, no plastic pollution, no sea levels rising, they have been lying to you for YEARS. All they want is a single governing body to rule every person on this planet, they will tell you lies, initiate world wars, perpetuate genocides in order to achieve that global government, and once they get that, and they will, you will then see the true agenda revealed.

    Reply
  • June 29, 2019 at 7:13 pm
    Permalink

    He should have used a green pen and a red pen.

    Reply
  • July 12, 2019 at 2:16 pm
    Permalink

    Im scared

    Reply
  • July 16, 2019 at 9:36 am
    Permalink

    Ehh… I would understand how it would be seen as accurate in 1973… the population graph was accurate, although the time wasn't: Most current models predict that the population will grow until around 10 billion then flatten out, becoming stable. We see this today, as technology is conditioning us to produce less frequently overall (Mainly in developed countries like the US and China). the pollution graph was pretty accurate as well but underestimated the time.

    The quality of like graph was the most inaccurate graph here… I wonder how they came up with the algorithms to predict quality of life. Surely that is a subjective matter, but it is generally agreed on that the quality of life today is better than it ever has been (2019). That graph was way off. The natural resource graph was accurate but the timing was wrong: it vastly underestimated the amount of resources available on Earth. Contrary to popular beliefs, there are enough fossil fuels available on Earth for centuries to come: most fossil fuels are deep in the ocean (70% of the Earth is made of water and most of life on Earth and most of life that roamed the Earth since the start of the Phanerozoic Eon has been in the oceans… thus allowing for the formation of fossil fuels)

    When the interviewer asked what would life would be like in 100 years or so, (8:51), the professor was largely right: An increase of cultures (multiculturalism) is prominent in the world today. Public transportation (uber, lyft) are dominating and will become even more prevalent as autonomous transportation increases. Only thing I disagree with is the number of hours people will work. Overtime, automation will replace most repetitive jobs, which is a large part of the job sector in the world; more people will go into the creative fields than anything else. I suspect 20 hour work weeks in 100 years as the norms, and eventually universal basic income will become the foundation of basic needs.
    Amazing to see how technology, even decades ago, as well as people were predicting the future of the world. The same issues we have today was prominent in 1973. Some things will never change. Thanks for sharing the video!

    Reply
  • July 17, 2019 at 12:24 am
    Permalink

    the state of denial of most commenters here is from those that drank the koolaid. I am glad to see that the powers that be have come together to share their truth and found appropriate solutions for the people of the planet.

    Reply
  • July 20, 2019 at 9:52 pm
    Permalink

    Too many people in my world. We need more deaths, we need more wars.

    Reply
  • July 26, 2019 at 1:44 am
    Permalink

    I've heard this apocalyptic predictions since I was born. Even today they are still predicting and same crap and over and over they have turned out to be wrong.

    Reply
  • July 26, 2019 at 12:43 pm
    Permalink

    This was so wrong

    Reply
  • July 29, 2019 at 8:33 am
    Permalink

    Resource based economy is the solution but need to be implemented locally and through communities.

    Reply
  • July 30, 2019 at 7:59 pm
    Permalink

    Ghost in the machine. Only a break down in world I.T. could cause a catastrophic series of events

    Reply
  • July 31, 2019 at 1:00 am
    Permalink

    So basically we'll be back to the dark or middle ages

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 5:41 am
    Permalink

    The machine states "man can not sustain current population for more than a few decades"…Yet here we are. Same incorrect rhetoric for decades

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 5:52 am
    Permalink

    "Australia will have to lose some of its own self decisions." No, I think most people want a sovereign country. There's a push back against globalization

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 5:55 am
    Permalink

    Lol. "You will drive a smaller car. Work less." Meanwhile most Americans drive SUVs, work 40+ hours and are too fat to truly enjoy an outdoor lifestyle.

    Reply
  • August 27, 2019 at 4:26 am
    Permalink

    Once again. More fake news propaganda

    Reply
  • August 28, 2019 at 6:08 pm
    Permalink

    Well, you can set your clock to that info! Foresight proof is one of my faves'!!

    Reply
  • August 29, 2019 at 7:09 pm
    Permalink

    Even back in 1973 they predicted our downfall. Just 20 more years and we’re mad maxing it baybeee

    Reply
  • August 30, 2019 at 12:46 pm
    Permalink

    Totally needed this in the morning

    Reply
  • August 30, 2019 at 6:38 pm
    Permalink

    We’re all screwed

    Reply
  • September 1, 2019 at 12:10 am
    Permalink

    One more year of hot pockets on demand

    Reply
  • September 2, 2019 at 1:57 pm
    Permalink

    I'm sampling this..

    Reply
  • September 4, 2019 at 10:33 am
    Permalink

    "We are starting to clean our atmosphere" – yeah dude, like no, we don't.

    Reply
  • September 10, 2019 at 10:36 pm
    Permalink

    Sadly only 354,530 views, while BTS has 300,000,000…

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 5:51 am
    Permalink

    I will be 80 years old in 2045. Looks like I am gonna' be checking out just before the hotel burns to the ground.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 5:55 am
    Permalink

    If we kill all the idiots who don't believe in man made climate change, maybe we can still save the planet.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:38 pm
    Permalink

    Imagine if they did this research again today? People would go insane, cause we are running out of time

    Reply
  • September 18, 2019 at 3:06 pm
    Permalink

    You can only connect the dots by looking backwards.

    Reply
  • September 18, 2019 at 4:54 pm
    Permalink

    That ai was damn sure 😮😮😮

    Reply
  • September 19, 2019 at 3:39 am
    Permalink

    Ah so this is how a terminal cancer patient feels when they hear the diagnosis.

    Reply
  • September 21, 2019 at 1:58 am
    Permalink

    30 years later our efforts are still a drop in the ocean

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 2:49 am
    Permalink

    Computer predicted that life in 2020 will be boring af.. or I will enjoy green spaces and public transport.. I'm so not interested..

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:19 am
    Permalink

    The fact a multi billion dollar oligarch just posted a video about climate change and will proceed to do nothing about it

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 9:43 pm
    Permalink

    Analogy: 
    A doctor has tell a patient that he dying of lung cancer. The doctor is so upset after telling his patient that he steps outside and smokes a cigarette.
    This is no different. Scientists have been telling us since the 70s that this has been a problem and here we are – having done nothing – making more pollution, more population. And why? Because it feels good.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 2:17 pm
    Permalink

    Too bad our concept of states and self-interest prevent mutually beneficial multilateralism

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 10:06 am
    Permalink

    The Club of Rome are the problem they want to destroy civilisation to bring in a feudal technocracy dictatorship with them in charge they invented the climate change narrative to start things along.

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 3:29 pm
    Permalink

    Humans never got past stupid. It’s covered up be greed and envy.

    Reply
  • October 1, 2019 at 8:45 pm
    Permalink

    We were on a road to manage population vis a vis JFK’s population control program established at UN. it was reversed and defunded by Ronald Reagen who equated unbridled population growth with spurring economic development. He defunded all family planning programs globally sending the head of the US anti abortion lobby as the US representative to the UN population management program. Ah, which planet will the GOP invade to inhabit once earth has been rendered habitation free?

    Reply
  • October 2, 2019 at 5:59 pm
    Permalink

    Everything I watch on this subject keeps pointing to the years 2040-2050. It is inconceivable that these theorists are all trying to fear monger, especially when this was recorded. People need to wake up. The Kardashian’s are not that important.

    Reply
  • October 3, 2019 at 1:43 am
    Permalink

    worst Halo trailer ever

    Reply
  • October 3, 2019 at 5:02 am
    Permalink

    Bet Sim City is more realistic than whatever model they used here!

    Reply
  • October 3, 2019 at 5:02 am
    Permalink

    Bet Sim City is more realistic than whatever model they used here!

    Reply
  • October 4, 2019 at 1:48 am
    Permalink

    Plastic will save the world.

    Reply
  • October 4, 2019 at 3:18 am
    Permalink

    In my 66 years of life from my own observation, this model correlates perfectly with the way the world has changed. The first half of this video is great but the discussion following explanation of the model is not useful.

    Reply
  • October 4, 2019 at 8:48 pm
    Permalink

    I needed a good laugh. Bahahahahahahahaha

    Reply
  • October 4, 2019 at 9:47 pm
    Permalink

    Oh the irony. Australia is one of the biggest polluters around.

    Reply
  • October 5, 2019 at 12:13 am
    Permalink

    Director of world bank? Dis information, likely.

    Reply
  • October 5, 2019 at 7:12 am
    Permalink

    The bible says there will be an end in Revelation long before computers, long before climate change was mentioned so for me it’s meant to be.

    Reply
  • October 5, 2019 at 8:10 pm
    Permalink

    It's all planned by rulers. Check Agenda 21.

    Reply
  • October 6, 2019 at 4:21 am
    Permalink

    Cool, which line on the chart represents ephemeralization?

    Reply
  • October 6, 2019 at 5:33 pm
    Permalink

    Definitely feeling that quality of life line….

    Reply
  • October 7, 2019 at 4:26 am
    Permalink

    Don't need a computer to tell you that the BIBLE already been stating that since day one. The time of destruction is just around the bend. Best be prepared because its a coming.

    Reply
  • October 7, 2019 at 7:37 am
    Permalink

    Scientists: Population growth is getting too big! Stop having kids!

    Also Scientists: cures Malaria in Africa

    Reply
  • October 7, 2019 at 8:40 am
    Permalink

    It doesn’t take a scientist or a computer or a bible to realize that the world will inevitably end.

    Reply
  • October 7, 2019 at 10:18 am
    Permalink

    This is a great video. Thanks for putting it up. Love this kind of thing.

    Reply
  • October 7, 2019 at 11:05 pm
    Permalink

    Tbh the video got a lot of truth in it

    Reply
  • October 7, 2019 at 11:14 pm
    Permalink

    It will be ok…calm the F down…but just incase stock up on food and alcohol..

    Reply
  • October 8, 2019 at 2:31 am
    Permalink

    It won't exist cause we'll be in the simulation by then if we aren't already in one that is.

    Reply
  • October 8, 2019 at 3:52 am
    Permalink

    Lols. We should embrace the anarchy until we go extinct. No point in thinking about the future, or the next generation. It would actually be considered cruel to have a child at this point, purely done in ones self interest.

    Reply
  • October 8, 2019 at 6:52 am
    Permalink

    In the 900s, people thought the world would end at year 1000.

    Reply
  • October 8, 2019 at 1:05 pm
    Permalink

    Repost this again this needs to be seen. We’ve really known this long and still have done nothing, here we are with everyone saying we’re at a critical point, this guy said this would be a critical point in the 70’s what the heck. I was born in 99’ I didn’t have any conscious understanding of our globes health until 2010 and I’m severely disappointed. I hope we can clean up everyone’s mess over the next 50 years otherwise major history in human existence is coming

    Reply
  • October 8, 2019 at 7:16 pm
    Permalink

    Greed and Idiocracy will be the death of us all!😣

    Reply
  • October 8, 2019 at 7:32 pm
    Permalink

    It's errie seeing this beacouse it's somewhat right

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 4:11 am
    Permalink

    The pro-capitalist colonizers are too busy defending their greed to see that destroying capitalism is saving the planet.

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 4:42 am
    Permalink

    Those computer predictions were completely wrong. Population and quality of life actually continued to grow and improve exponentially all around the world. Consumption has also only increased.

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 6:04 am
    Permalink

    Civilization**

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 7:12 am
    Permalink

    If they only knew how correct they are……

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 7:37 am
    Permalink

    In a hundred years hippie looking man, you will be eating crickets and maggots. You won't have a car, you will live in a sanitised shelter with an air purifier under authoritarian rule. You will probably be a slave of some sort. I can also predict the future lol

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 7:55 am
    Permalink

    I was expecting it to be some stupid prediction the world would end 10 years ago but actually it was scarily accurate in what it has predicted so far. It's interesting how open they were about discussing increasing population wreaking havoc on our planet and our lives but today it's the subject nobody dares mention.

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 8:16 am
    Permalink

    Your stupidity is the only thing that was predicted by spreading this nonsense. Go outside and dance for two hours on one foot, and you might avoid the next rain shower.

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 8:29 am
    Permalink

    Cute pig tail girl

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 9:09 am
    Permalink

    Oh great we have 20 years to live

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 10:17 am
    Permalink

    Fake News…

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 11:05 am
    Permalink

    Bevis, 2:09 "He said Peter off."
    Butt head, "Shut up this is interesting."

    Reply
  • October 9, 2019 at 12:19 pm
    Permalink

    Do not show this to Greta.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *