AMD has a mountain to climb, both in the CPU
and GPU sector. Compared with their rivals they’re a tiny company. It’s a real David
VS Goliath situation… only there are two Goliaths, named Nvidia and Intel. But AMD
is the hero that we need. Because it’s not the market leader that drives progress. Instead,
it’s determined by the underdog who gets there second.
We only have to look at the processor market where AMD has been in second place for over
a decade. Ever since Intel has been ahead, progress has slowed to a crawl, with them
releasing generation after generation of processors with insignificant improvements to power efficiency
and performance, especially when compared with before. Don’t get me wrong- I’m sure
that if the roles were reversed then AMD would have done the same. The last time they were
ahead, with their X2 processors, even the budget model was expensive until Intel released
the Core 2 Duos, when they suddenly halved in price. It’s just the way the world works.
Long story short, since there hasn’t been competition, progress has become SO much slower.
Maybe both companies hit a wall with Moore’s Law at the same time! But I doubt it. Intel
had done enough to be ahead, had seen that AMD wasn’t catching up any time soon and
decided to milk existing tech and core numbers for as long as they could, or else risk becoming
a monopoly and being cracked down on by every anti-competitive law out there. At least the
processors we buy last for longer, I guess. But things may change with Zen, AMD’s new
processor design that was created by the legendary dude who made the X2’s back in the day.
These aim to be almost as fast as current Intel CPUs, but with lots of cores! And about
time! Intel’s dual cores came out in 2005, their quad cores came out in January of 2007,
at which point I foolishly was like ‘oh wow we’ll be seeing 8, 16 and 32 core processors
before long!’… yeah, right. It didn’t happen. AMD did kind of go down this route,
offering 6 core CPUs in 2010 and 8 in 2011 at reasonably competitive prices, but they
only ever went up against Intel’s faster 4 core offerings, since most applications
were only designed for one or two cores… and although AMD had many cores, individually
they sucked. And if you wanted more than 4 cores from Intel- and this still holds true
to this day- then you’d have to pay A LOT for the privilege.
And this is the mountain that AMD has to climb! It’s not just about competing with Intel’s
$300 CPUs, which are already better than anything AMD has to offer. Intel have gone far beyond
that already but have hidden it with prices that most people won’t consider. They have
6, 8 and even 10 core CPUs out on the market already at sky-high prices, ready to drop
to whatever price is needed to compete with AMD’s Zen. Let’s say Zen manages everything
that they’ve claimed. That they release an 8 core processor that’s just as fast
as Intel’s current CPUs. This is great news for consumers, essential news for AMD and
a minor irritation for Intel, since they might have to lower prices and stop making $1000
on every 8 core CPU they sell. And let’s not forget that Intel’s 6, 8
and 10 core processors are based on Broadwell. This isn’t even as good as Intel’s current
Skylake standard, and with Kaby Lake just around the corner it won’t be long before
these processors are 2 generations behind cutting edge tech. Yet this is the standard
that Zen is aiming to compete with! Don’t get me wrong. Zen is great news for
everybody but Intel. But I only see it as catch up for AMD. It will help them to climb
the mountain, but won’t let them float up into space. And that’s the worst analogy
ever. Zen will stop Intel from making extortionate amounts off of their best stuff, which they
have been doing for so many years. But it’s not as though it’s going to flip the table
and let AMD do this! It seems that everything they make will have an Intel competitor that’s
already out, available and benchmarked! …unless they have something up their sleeve that they’re
not sharing. Which is possible. But so could Intel, who let’s remember has been sat twiddling
their thumbs for so many years. Best of luck to AMD, they sure as hell need
it. The Mhz-war is over. Long live the upcoming core-war!

AMD’s Challenge of 2016 – CPUs
Tagged on:                                                                     

100 thoughts on “AMD’s Challenge of 2016 – CPUs

  • September 21, 2016 at 9:43 pm
    Permalink

    lets be honest, the AMD 8 cores aren't actually 8 cores

    Reply
  • September 21, 2016 at 10:22 pm
    Permalink

    DX12 is where FX CPUS shine outperforming i5s and even older i7s.

    Reply
  • September 21, 2016 at 10:40 pm
    Permalink

    the 6800k is a fine price though..

    Reply
  • September 21, 2016 at 10:42 pm
    Permalink

    Does anyone know when the next intel gen is coming out ? Or is a skylake the best way to go for this quarter/next year quarter.

    Reply
  • September 21, 2016 at 11:10 pm
    Permalink

    Its not that the AMD FX CPUs had 8 cores, they had 3 cores, with 2 threads a piece for the 6 core, as well as 4 cores for their 8 core. Thats why they had a big lawsuit over false advertising. Intel is now releasing consumer grade 8 and 12 core CPUs

    Reply
  • September 21, 2016 at 11:14 pm
    Permalink

    Cores mean nothing in video games and many other programs… single core performance with a reasonable amount of cores is what work in the real world… not having 12 cores with only 30% of them are being used… garbage. AMD really needs to have more transistors in there cores while offering 4 to 6 cores at most….

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 12:13 am
    Permalink

    sigh
    I can almost hear
    r/ayyymd: 'Petition to add 2kliksphilip to list of known heretics'
    And you had JUST gotten on good terms with them too…

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 1:54 am
    Permalink

    ;( I have to get a new motherboard….and I'm poor.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 6:09 am
    Permalink

    I was really hoping AMD would get better but they seemingly REFUSED to improve and inventualy I had to swap so I would stop getting awful heat issues, bottlenecks and performance. I swapped to an i7 4790k Devils Canyon two years ago and I'm not looking back any time soon. I really hope AMD starts competing so we can start seeing tangible improvements in CPU's.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 10:22 am
    Permalink

    I wouldn't say they're behind NVidia on the performance side, on the market side definitely though. NVidia is like Intel, accepting their semi-monopoly and not doing really anything good for the consumers. Their mainstream cards like the GTX 1060 is slower than the RX 480 in DX12 but not DX 11 (most of the time).

    Nobody cares though, they just want the NVidia badge because it's known as the top dog.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 2:04 pm
    Permalink

    There will be no "core-war" since no games out there use more than 4 cores effectively. The only reason to buy 6, 8 and 10 core cpus is multitasking and rendering. But we already have CPUs for that, by intel. Oh and no offense, but AMD's flagship 8 core cpu is actually 4core + 4 threads, they are just "faking" the 8 core sh*t.
    I bought an 8 core intel xeon cpu for 80$. E5 2670-v1, overclocked to 3.2Ghz. It' almost on the same level and the new intel i7 series.
    But guess what, even the old i7 980 will be capable to run anything without any problem.
    This is not he era of "core-wars", it's time to optimise the softwares instead of adding +5% speed to the processors each year.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 2:06 pm
    Permalink

    make AMD great again!

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 2:51 pm
    Permalink

    AMD has been playing catch up with Intel and nVidia for ages. Thy are the "cheaper" alternative and always have been and I doubt that will ever change. I must admit, though I like the video, I disagree with your idea of innovation be driven by AMD. The problem with this is the exponential costs that go into R&D. AMD recycles and re-uses technology without really innovating. AMD tends to just use the same tech but slap more of it together. They also look for ways to make their tech our of cheaper materials to keep it cost effective, which is fine, but not really innovating.

    Intel and nVidia are the only ones with the budget for R&D. R&D is the most costly part of manufacturing and why parts from Intel and nVidia are so costly when you by their latest tech. If AMD does anything, it only forces it's competitors to spend that kind of R&D capital to make sure they have a grip on the market to keep AMD from "catching up". That doesn't mean AMD is the innovator, it just means because they are a competitor in the free market, it forces these companies to spend those R&D budgets.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 3:35 pm
    Permalink

    Hey bitches. If you still want an intel processor. go for 2600k on ebay. You will save a few hundred bucks for the same performance as the current intel generation.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 7:09 pm
    Permalink

    IN-tell vs in-TELL?

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 8:28 pm
    Permalink

    I will never take money matter company , I'm only take fair company.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 9:25 pm
    Permalink

    Core war? What?
    Even most of the professional applications I use like ZBrush, Substance Designer and Photoshop rarely use more than one core and when they do use them there's a diminishing rate of returns. I've stuck with 4 cores for 5 going on 6 years now and to be honest I don't see myself needing to switch to 6 or 8 anytime soon.
    Pretty much the only thing I do that utilizes 4 cores fully is rendering in 3dsmax.

    I imagine you don't need more than 4 cores for most games either. AMD should focus on making good energy efficient cheap quad cores for the time being. There's time for a pissing contest once they have a foothold in the cpu market.

    Reply
  • September 22, 2016 at 11:09 pm
    Permalink

    I hate AMD.

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 1:12 am
    Permalink

    I hope AMD can be in my first PC build 🙂

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 6:53 am
    Permalink

    anti-monopoly laws being enforced in the US?

    BAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHHHAAAAHAHAHAHA!!

    I havent laughed this hard in years.

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 9:42 am
    Permalink

    I don't think we will have a core war. It is not needed and Intel knows it. To this day, the best CPU to game on is the intel 4 core family. AMD's Zen will have to compete in single thread performance and then in the whole package to be something more than a nuisance.

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 10:23 am
    Permalink

    talks about 'extortionate' prices meanwhile buying a 4k monitor with no qualms or clue gg

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 12:33 pm
    Permalink

    I highly fucking doubt that AMD will release anything that will properly compete with an Intel CPU. Zen is just going to be more empty AMD promises, as usual. AMD isn't this fragile, humble company that's just "trying to compete with the two Goliaths of the computer industry". There's a reason why Intel and Nvidia are technology superpowers right now; they're the best at what the do, period. While AMD may be the better budget option, there's a reason why it's looked at as the budget option. AMD's craftsmanship of both their GPUs and CPUs is garbage (power draw to performance ratio, lastability, overclocking potential, stability, etc.). So, expect to pay the higher price delta when buying an Intel or an Nvidia product. Not because they're selfish, evil companies, but because they actually work harder on making sure their product is refined and clean, and not a crock of shit like AMD likes to crank out regularly.

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 12:41 pm
    Permalink

    dimwit fanboy usually popping off at the comment, I wish they'd knock it off.

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 4:38 pm
    Permalink

    All of these companies are feeding off of gullible consumers. AMD has dibs on the poor, Intel fucks the upper middle. Why dont you people start wondering if there are any anti competitive laws stopping more brands from gaining leeway.

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 7:15 pm
    Permalink

    You got a couple of things wrong, firstly yes a wall has been met, the entire reason for cores was because ages ago we met a wall with heat so the solution was to basically have more than one cpu, now we have 4 on average which is all we really need to have because most applications (games in particular) for your average enthusiast simply won't support any more because it takes work to add support and we are doing just fine right now, game quality progress for example is limited by graphics not cpu power.

    Now if you want more cores anyways that's fine, just get the 5820k instead of the 6700k after the pricier (but also better) motherboards are accounted for you would be generally spending around €60 more, not 1000. Obviously the even higher end stuff is going to be hugely expensive and theres one simple reason, THIS IS PROFESSIONAL GRADE STUFF WHICH WE DONT NEED. Professional grade stuff is almost always hugely expensive compared to the consumer stuff no matter what you are buying and thats a good thing because that makes our stuff cheaper simply because they will always stretch for better in order to win over the professional market. This is because corporations have money to burn on better equipment and that trickles down. Take nVidias Quadros for example, a lot (if not all?) of the quadros have a Geforce equivalent which is cheaper by ridiculous amounts ( factor of 3? maybe even 5?)

    So Intel aren't really being assholes about their semi-monopoly, Nvidia however are clearly being assholes about their untouched higher end options with the 1070 being wayyyy too expensive than it's supposed to be (but Vega will most definitely fix that problem….eventually)

    I think you just like complaining, I know I do 😛 , I just prefer about complaing about worthwhile things.

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 7:20 pm
    Permalink

    Do I buy the 6700k or wait for zen?

    Reply
  • September 23, 2016 at 8:04 pm
    Permalink

    I hope that AMD doesn't pull an RX480 with this one price wise.

    Reply
  • September 24, 2016 at 1:17 am
    Permalink

    Yep, i like Nvdia and intel but id be happy AF if AMD relased something good and cheap so nvida and intel get cheaper

    Reply
  • September 24, 2016 at 6:33 pm
    Permalink

    kaby lake will bring only minor clock-speed improvements and is pretty much identical to skylake, So amd doesn't have much to worse about there. they should be much more consernered about intel's upcoming 10nm process, especially considering Global founderary's 14nm finfet is 22nm with finets. so unless global foundries hurries the fuck up and releases a much better processor node soon intel will have a huge node advantage.

    Reply
  • September 24, 2016 at 11:04 pm
    Permalink

    Wrong analogy. David was always destined to win. But you don't imply AMD gonna ever take down Intel. The gulf is just too vast. Nvidia is closer, but even that is doubtful.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2016 at 12:54 am
    Permalink

    How likely do you think it is for AMD to release a CPU that's as good as or better than the current i5's or i7's for less than $300?

    Reply
  • September 25, 2016 at 4:53 pm
    Permalink

    calling it an irritation is misleading. Intel needs competition

    Reply
  • September 26, 2016 at 5:03 am
    Permalink

    If Philip responds to this I'm gonna eat my left nut

    Reply
  • September 26, 2016 at 12:58 pm
    Permalink

    fuck amd

    Reply
  • September 27, 2016 at 3:38 am
    Permalink

    Core war? What we really need is IPC war.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2016 at 10:13 am
    Permalink

    Atleast AMD doesn't put useless bloatware on your PC when you install their drivers.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2016 at 12:41 pm
    Permalink

    Hi, I'm the sucker that bought a recent 6 core Intel CPU at an extortionate price; AMA

    Reply
  • September 27, 2016 at 10:08 pm
    Permalink

    Which do you prefer?

    CPU:
    – Intel
    – AMD

    GPU:
    – Nvidia
    – AMD

    APU:
    – (Some company)

    Comment your favorite manufacturers

    Reply
  • September 30, 2016 at 11:12 am
    Permalink

    Awesome vid here bro, you did a great job XD

    Reply
  • September 30, 2016 at 8:29 pm
    Permalink

    I miss the days where AMD and Intel competed neck-and-neck in the CPU market, one company would release a monster processor, then the other company would top it, it was a great time to be a hardware geek. Hell, for a while there, nobody WANTED Intel's CPUs (itanium sucked and it was a stupid name, to boot), while anybody who was anybody was using AMD's FX-series and then FX64 and X2 series (I do miss you, FX-57). AMD was on top for a short while, then Intel released the Q6600 and AMD was relegated to red-headed stepchild of CPU makers from then, on. I don't expect Zen to be the revolution they say it's going to be.

    I'm still running a 5 year old core i7 980x, because it's STILL competitive against all but the highest-end Intel processors and it STILL blows away anything AMD has produced since then. I'd love to upgrade, I just haven't seen a REASON to do so. I'm really hoping Zen will be a game-changer, but I'm not holding my breath. If I were the CEO of AMD, I'd release 12/24 (core/SMT cores) to beat up on Intel a bit…if that didn't beat Intel's top-of-the-line CPU, then I'd go with 16/32 as my top end (or 32/64, or whatever it took). I'd remove that silly GPU that nobody at the enthusiast level uses anyway and I'd use that area to stuff the CPU full of more cores, however many it took to beat intel's best. From there I'd price slightly cheaper than Intel's offerings, but keep performance just ahead (which I suspect will take many more cores than Intel needs). I'd throw per-core performance out the window, it's not as important as it once was, with virtually everything recognizing as many cores as you can throw at it. I'd go for pure, unadulterated, multicore power. Use cinebench as my benchmark of choice, put my 64 cores up against intel's 16 and make intel look silly, like AMD used to do with the 64-bit CPUs and dual-core models. It's either that, or AMD will be relegated to the embedded and laptop/low-power market and I will forget about them. I will miss them, but I will forget about them, because they'll be of no use to me.

    Reply
  • September 30, 2016 at 8:52 pm
    Permalink

    waiting for zen to upgrade might be the best bang for buck.

    Reply
  • October 1, 2016 at 4:03 pm
    Permalink

    I don't think Intel can afford to take the margins that AMD would be willing to considering they had to take a loss on broadwell they have been on rocky ground ever since and people just are not buying Intel CPU's because the if you even have a second generation Intel CPU your doing ok not brilliantly but ok.

    Also there trouble with 10nm taking more development time than expected has also put them in a tricky position, because development time means money.

    Reply
  • October 1, 2016 at 5:06 pm
    Permalink

    Good Video

    One thing worth mentioning though.
    afaik, how demanding software is has been increasing at a decreasing rate so their just isn't the need for the exponential leaps in hardware. I don't know whether more demanding software leads to more powerful hardware or if it's the other way around, or both at the same time but I think it's possible that the reason that you don't have the exponential growth in hardware capability is that you don't have exponential growth in software requirements.

    Nevertheless, monopolies are never a good thing for consumers and the more competitive AMD is the better it is for both AMD and Intel customers.

    Reply
  • October 2, 2016 at 9:02 pm
    Permalink

    forget about the commercial grade cpus like xeon no wants to count their cores because you will be there all day just counting cores.

    Reply
  • October 2, 2016 at 9:39 pm
    Permalink

    AMD < Intel master race

    Reply
  • October 3, 2016 at 2:26 pm
    Permalink

    But the difference between 2 Intel CPU architectures in IPC is literally 3-4% (total). Kaby Lake has near zero IPC improvements (Source : Intel).

    So even Haswell level + DDR4 and comparable clocks and instruction sets = competitive to Kaby Lake.

    Reply
  • October 3, 2016 at 4:39 pm
    Permalink

    i see why competition is good for consumer now. so now i'm really rooting for amd. cause one day i would like to get that intel 8 core cpu. and this cant happen unless amd gets better.

    Reply
  • October 4, 2016 at 8:56 pm
    Permalink

    0:58 intel didnt hit Moore's law, but there is good reason why they cant improve single core perf significantly. AMD cant do it either. Zen just barely ahead of intel in ipc. x86 single thread cant be improved anymore

    Reply
  • October 4, 2016 at 11:20 pm
    Permalink

    So AMD wont have the fastest high end stuff, SO what. AMD has always been better mid market then Intel.

    Reply
  • October 4, 2016 at 11:51 pm
    Permalink

    Great video! Subbed

    Reply
  • October 5, 2016 at 5:17 am
    Permalink

    Such a great explanation of what is happening

    Reply
  • October 5, 2016 at 8:43 am
    Permalink

    i was on amd side for long having amd cpu and gpu, but now moving to intel and nvidia maybe…they aren't just good enough?? yet…

    Reply
  • October 5, 2016 at 11:30 am
    Permalink

    Which "war" was the most meaningful? The Bit Wars, the MHz Wars, or the Upcoming Core Wars?

    Reply
  • October 5, 2016 at 10:40 pm
    Permalink

    This video would have been a lot more clear if the module architecture of Bulldozer had been explained.

    Reply
  • October 6, 2016 at 10:37 am
    Permalink

    Reading through the comments makes me wanna die every time.

    Reply
  • October 6, 2016 at 1:59 pm
    Permalink

    Why do you say Intel like that. -_- Stop raising your pitch at the end of the word and lower it instead! You sound like a Chinese person trying to speak English.

    Reply
  • October 7, 2016 at 11:44 am
    Permalink

    Good review.

    Reply
  • October 7, 2016 at 1:47 pm
    Permalink

    Amd sucks, because its runned by chinese, Chinese are dumb

    Reply
  • October 7, 2016 at 3:38 pm
    Permalink

    I came here for the K2 thumbnail.

    Reply
  • October 8, 2016 at 12:29 am
    Permalink

    so intel kept making small improvments while you didnt and now you are going to make one big improvement that is still not going to catch you up with intel.

    then what? you going to whine about how intle is better than you some more?

    i dont think you are going to do that i think you are going to sell people your shity tech then keep selling your shity tech till it is old shity tech before you do anything relavent again.

    Reply
  • October 8, 2016 at 1:50 pm
    Permalink

    Fx 8350 at 4.5Ghz beats i7 4770 on cinebench, shows that even aged, amd can still hold their own

    Reply
  • October 9, 2016 at 1:02 am
    Permalink

    amd is great, but don't take your love for them too far, or you will become just like the intel and nvidia fanboys you hate. Use you brains when you buy is all. this goes for all consumers

    ps:I love nvidia and intel for things like hypertreading and high end graphics cards rhat work well in every video game title

    i almost got the 295×2, but got the 1080 instead to lnsnsure proper performance on all games, especially ones that only use 1 gpu

    Reply
  • October 9, 2016 at 4:39 am
    Permalink

    AMD sucks

    Reply
  • October 9, 2016 at 7:33 am
    Permalink

    Isn't broadwell-e only outdated in name and not in tech? It's using the 14nm process and has a higher IPC than skylake.

    Reply
  • October 10, 2016 at 12:05 pm
    Permalink

    i am gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyylllllllllllllllllllllooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrddddddddddddddwwwwwwwwattttttttterssssssssssoooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

    Reply
  • October 14, 2016 at 1:29 am
    Permalink

    Amd Vega and Zen.. I really hope they deliver in a big way.

    Reply
  • October 14, 2016 at 6:25 pm
    Permalink

    AMD is fuck

    Reply
  • October 17, 2016 at 3:11 am
    Permalink

    AMD is gonna be the leader in speed, if you either buy an Intel or Nvidia right now, you would, or probably at least, regret of AMD's lowpriced high performance stuff.

    Reply
  • October 17, 2016 at 8:17 am
    Permalink

    background sound pls

    Reply
  • October 18, 2016 at 5:25 pm
    Permalink

    We need competition in the market. Intel supremacy isn't healthy at all.

    Reply
  • October 18, 2016 at 6:14 pm
    Permalink

    is there a amd cpu that can compete against an i5 or i7? i have a amd FX8350 and people keep saying to me that my FPS suffers because it uses 8 cores and is poor in single core performance since most games use single cores thats why it stuggles has amd made a cpu that specializes in single core like i5 and i7 does? im not asking if amd can beat intel just want to know if theres any amd close to them.

    Reply
  • October 19, 2016 at 2:56 am
    Permalink

    support AMD, dun let them die.

    Reply
  • October 20, 2016 at 8:29 pm
    Permalink

    Amd cores are different from intel cores, so stop comparing both cores >:(

    Reply
  • October 27, 2016 at 1:45 pm
    Permalink

    Core war its go and AMD already have the lead in cores << to price by a huge margin.

    Reply
  • October 28, 2016 at 8:48 pm
    Permalink

    Yeah, but, GPUs have already won the core war.

    Reply
  • November 1, 2016 at 12:30 pm
    Permalink

    Intel 👍👍👍, NVIDIA 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍, AMD 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎

    Reply
  • November 14, 2016 at 5:43 am
    Permalink

    There won't be a core war. Part of the reason 12+ cores isn't main stream is because it's hard for software developers to take advantage of all of them, and barely shows a difference in games and day-to-day use. You could render, say, a video faster, but that's about it.

    Reply
  • November 29, 2016 at 6:41 am
    Permalink

    totally agree, we all should keep our mind clear instead blindly jump on to the HYPE train. lets look at the rx480, it is a great card, people were so HYPED about, but it turns out to be only slightly faster than gtx970 in some cases…what im trying to say is that zen cpu might be great, but it won't really make the game turn by that much. but is still a good news for the average consumer because the intel won't monopoly too much on us anymore since we have a bit more option.

    Reply
  • December 3, 2016 at 11:47 pm
    Permalink

    At the end of the day I LOVE AMD, but the reality is that an i7 Skylake is only 260 dollars right now and AMD's Zen is going to be like 4-500 dollars! For 430 dollars I got an Intel i7 6700K a GOOD Z170 board and 16 GB of crucial DDR4 2400 MHZ RAM! For what ZEN will cost I got a CPU, mobo & RAM!And here's the catch…i7 6700K is STILL going to out perform ZEN in games. So I still support AMD (for now) when it comes to GPU's (got an RX 480 8GB) but as far as CPU's go the smart $$$ is on Intel!

    Reply
  • December 4, 2016 at 1:34 am
    Permalink

    krabylake is just the tiny improvement for huge money…..

    Reply
  • December 8, 2016 at 10:47 pm
    Permalink

    Shit still runs at 2 cores. 4 is worthy of praise those days as it means devs have to give half a shit about making a game that works. Especially when porting from console.

    Reply
  • December 9, 2016 at 5:59 pm
    Permalink

    Intel has got a 24 core CPU in the professional market already yet the best AMD has out at the moment is an FX9590 that has got 8 cores and a massively higher TDP than the intel 24 core CPU.

    Yes, the core speed is higher on the AMD part but the overal performance of the AMD chip is only a fraction.

    What if Intel makes 16 core CPU's available on the consumer market at competitive prices of what AMD has to offer with zen? (If the actual rumors are true)

    I mean, is AMD able to even make a come back when Intel has so much they could use as a weapon to make the ZEN products seem as meh as the FX products look now?

    =/ interesting stuff really but not that great on the consumer end of the deal either way.

    Reply
  • December 20, 2016 at 12:15 pm
    Permalink

    I feel like AMD is trying to be just behind the curb, enough to drive growth. But Intel went too far. IDK, hwjdab hjv bjhw

    Reply
  • December 29, 2016 at 3:41 am
    Permalink

    Nvidia doesnt make CPU's anymore…

    Reply
  • December 31, 2016 at 8:22 pm
    Permalink

    amd is a bad company if they get ahead we are screwed. intel still has good prices for being a monopoly all this time.

    Reply
  • January 4, 2017 at 7:00 pm
    Permalink

    tell me, do you need 256 cores in an i7? do you know how much that would cost? we don't NEED that yet.

    Reply
  • April 30, 2017 at 1:07 pm
    Permalink

    Done.

    Reply
  • May 4, 2017 at 8:31 am
    Permalink

    R Y Z E N

    Reply
  • June 26, 2017 at 9:14 pm
    Permalink

    yeah, now with threadripper and EPYC, Intel is under some serious pressure ^^

    Reply
  • August 1, 2017 at 2:42 pm
    Permalink

    Impressive on how AMD did all that. Ryzen is amazing.

    Reply
  • August 2, 2017 at 7:42 pm
    Permalink

    irritating intel they did! The new i9 cpus were so rushed to compete they are utter garbage.

    Reply
  • August 17, 2017 at 2:35 am
    Permalink

    It seems like they are doing it 🙂

    Reply
  • November 20, 2017 at 1:10 am
    Permalink

    100th dislike!

    I almost always like your videos kliksPhilip, but I just couldn't resist…

    Reply
  • November 23, 2017 at 3:54 pm
    Permalink

    fuck nvidia dont get me wrong i only buy nvidia graphics cards…BUT THAT'S EXACTLY IT… I ONLY BUY THEIR SHIT BECAUSE THERE'S NO COMPETITION NOTHING BETTER THAN THEM AMD IS NOTHING AND THAT'S WHY THOSE FUCKS INCREASE THE PRICES SO MUCH THAT WE'LL BE SELLING OUR BODIES TO PROSTITUTION TO GET A DECENT CARD….FUCK YOU NVIDIA

    Reply
  • November 24, 2017 at 11:18 am
    Permalink

    Nice video to watch in year 2017.

    Reply
  • December 31, 2017 at 4:08 pm
    Permalink

    minor

    Reply
  • July 25, 2018 at 2:58 pm
    Permalink

    Honestly, AMD seems to be slower on purpose so industry can charge what they want. There is no monopoly so government is happy.

    Reply
  • August 4, 2019 at 6:37 am
    Permalink

    Watching in 2019 and getting ready for my all AMD Ryzen/Navi buid 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *