It’s the battle of the quad core laptop
CPUs, in this video I’ll be comparing the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H against the Intel i5-8300H
CPU to find out which is superior in a number of applications and games. Let’s start off with the differences in
specs before getting into the benchmarks. Both of these CPUs have 4 cores and 8 threads.
Both CPUs have the same 2.3GHz base clock speed, and they both also have a maximum boost
of 4GHz, however the Intel chip has a 45 watt TDP while the Ryzen has a 35 watt TDP, though
that’s not exactly an apples to apples comparison due to different architectures. The Intel chip is using their 14nm Coffee
Lake architecture, while the Ryzen is based on 12nm Zen+. There’s a cache difference
too, 4mb for the Ryzen chip while the Intel chip is doubled at 8mb. The last key difference
between them is the memory support. The Ryzen 7 3750H supports dual channel memory at DDR4-2400,
while the Intel i5-8300H supports DDR4-2666, so the Intel platform has a slight advantage
on the memory speeds as well. Alright with the specs out of the way let’s
check out the machines we’re testing with. For the Intel i5-8300H I’m using my Lenovo
Y530, a good option as it doesn’t seem to pass the 45 watt TDP limit while under CPU
only load, like some other laptops do. For the Ryzen 7 3750H I’m testing with the ASUS
TUF FX505DU, and both laptops were tested with dual channel memory. You can find links
to my full reviews of each and pricing in the description. Let’s start out with the classic Cinebench
R15, because so many people are still so familiar with the scoring system. In this test the
Intel 8300H is ahead both in single core and multi core performance, with an 11.6% lead
for single core and a 6.7% lead for multi core when compared to the Ryzen 3750H. Don’t worry, I’ve got the newer Cinebench
R20 results as well. Again the 8300H was coming out ahead, with a 3.8% higher single core
score and 8% higher multi core score, so not quite as high when compared to the older R15
version shown previously. Let’s look at something more practical,
at least for me. I use Adobe Premiere to create all my videos, and these are the export times
for a 10 minute 1080p video. You’ll note that the 8300H is ahead at the top, but much
farther ahead in the middle bar which has Quick Sync enabled. Adobe Premiere is able
to take advantage of this, and it’s something Intel CPUs have had at the hardware level
for years, and is something Premiere can’t do with AMD CPUs at this time. This gives
a huge boost to the Intel CPU. The result up the top is with the 8300H and software
only, so no hardware acceleration just like the AMD CPU, and even without Quick Sync we’re
seeing the 8300H complete the task 37% faster than the 3750H, so video editors probably
want to preference an Intel option. I’ve also tested the warp stabilizer effect
in Adobe Premiere, basically it analyzes a piece of footage and smooths it out, and I
believe it only uses a single CPU core. In this case the Intel 8300H was only completing
the task 3.3% faster than the Ryzen 3750H, nowhere near as big of a difference compared
to exporting a video. My blender tests were done using Blenchmark,
so the standard BMW and Classroom benchmarks. The results were interesting, this was one
of the few tests where the 3750H was actually coming out ahead, though the differences are
quite small, but it was completing the tasks a few seconds faster. I ran this multiple
times and got pretty much the same results, under this workload the 8300H was seeing more
power limit throttling than other tests, which resulted in lower clock speeds, hence the
close results. Next up we’ll look at some Handbrake results.
I’ve converted one of my 4K video files to 1080p, shown by the smaller lighter purple
bars, and a separate 1080p video file to 720p, shown by the longer darker purple bars. In
both cases the 8300H is faster than the 3750H in terms of how many frames per second are
processed, 6.8% faster for the 4K file but then 14% quicker with the 1080p file. I’ve used the 7-Zip benchmark to test compression
and decompression speeds, and while the 8300H was a large 32.7% faster at compression, the
3750H scores a small win, and is about 4% faster when it comes to decompression. Much
less of a difference between the two when it comes to decompression compared to the
bigger compression difference though, so all around the 8300H is looking like a more balanced
option. I’ve used VeraCrypt to test AES encryption
and decryption speeds, and there was a much smaller difference between the two CPUs in
this test. The 8300H was performing encryption operations just 2% faster, and decryption
2.4% faster than the Ryzen 7 3750H, so doesn’t appear that it matters much which you pick
for this workload. The V-Ray benchmark uses the CPU to render
out a scene, and in this specific workload there was a fairly large 19.5% higher score
with the i5-8300H CPU, which was getting about 1000 points higher in this test. The Corona benchmark also uses the CPU to
render out a scene, and with this test the 8300H was 15% faster than the 3750H. I’m not personally a fan of GeekBench and
don’t usually use it, however I had quite a few requests to add it in, so here we are.
There was a 15.7% higher score with the 8300H for the multicore result, and a similar 15.8%
higher score when it came to single core performance. When we combine the results of all of these
tests, the Intel i5-8300H is around 17% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, however we can
see this is skewed quite a bit by the massive result up the top, which was the Adobe Premiere
export with quick sync. While it’s completely valid that Intel CPUs can complete these tasks
significantly faster due to hardware acceleration that the software can take advantage of, I’ve
also got a graph showing the results without that one. Not everyone is a video editor,
and not everyone with an Intel CPU will use quick sync either, I think it doesn’t work
if you export with the two pass setting, for example. Anyway without the quick sync result
on average the 8300H is still 10% faster, but it really depends on the specific workload.
The 3750H was ahead in decompression with 7-Zip, and just slightly faster in Blender,
though it was very close. Before we get into the gaming results, let’s
check out the power draw. I’ve measured the total system power draw from the wall,
so this is the entire laptop and not only the CPU, however I’ve measured during the
Blender BMW benchmark, so the CPU should be getting smashed. Additionally, if you recall
the blender results previously both machines actually completed the task in almost the
same amount of time, but despite this the 8300H laptop was consuming 20% more power.
Higher power draw on the Intel CPU was expected due to its higher TDP, plus there will be
differences with Intel’s 14nm architecture and AMD’s 12nm Zen+. This probably means we can expect more battery
life out of a 3750H machine due to that lower TDP and lower power draw. This isn’t a perfect
apples to apples comparison, but the Lenovo Y530 I’m using has a 3 cell 52.5 watt hour
battery, while the ASUS TUF FX505DU has a 3 cell 48 watt hour battery, so the 8300H
machine is a little larger. With the screen on 50% brightness, keyboard lighting off and
background apps disabled and just streaming YouTube videos, the 3750H system lasted slightly
longer despite having a smaller battery. This could be down to the Vega graphics consuming
less power than the Intel iGPU while streaming video, I’m not certain, but the 3750H machine
lasted longer with a smaller battery and running the same task, which looks like a plus towards
the Ryzen chip. While I could have improved the performance
a little with the i5-8300H by undervolting it, I haven’t done that here, as I wanted
to show real performance from an average laptop with this chip, and you can’t currently
undervolt the mobile AMD chips at the moment. You could argue that that’s an advantage
of the Intel chip, and I’d agree, though I don’t think most people buying laptops
will be doing this, it’s more of an enthusiast thing. For what it’s worth, I did run the
Blender test again with the undervolt applied, as I wanted to see if this would help reduce
the power limit throttling that made both CPUs basically even in that test. I only saw a few seconds difference though,
so in my specific case I don’t think there’s too much to gain, but it would of course vary
by workload and probably even between different laptops with the same CPUs. In most workloads,
undervolting should also see less overall power draw from the Intel system, unless it’s
still hitting the power limit once undervolted, which mine was doing in the Blender test,
so I had no change in that workload to power draw either. Maybe in future I should note
the power draw for every single CPU test and compare, however I didn’t do that here. For the gaming tests I’m using the Radeon
RX Vega 10 graphics that are built into the Ryzen CPU, and the UHD 630 graphics built
into the Intel CPU. Neither of these are going to provide an amazing gaming experience, but
I think it’s still important to see what we’re getting in the cases where we may
not have discrete graphics available. Overwatch was tested at 720p with high settings,
and we’re getting more than double the average frame rate with the Vega graphics, or a massive
136% improvement, pretty crazy. It was actually playable and went well on Vega, but noticeably
worse, though still usable with the Intel graphics. Similar deal in Fortnite at 720p at high settings,
except this time there’s a huge 196% improvement to average FPS with the Vega graphics, and
even the 1% low with is far ahead of the average FPS the 8300H was able to give us. CS:GO was tested at 720p and all settings
maxed out, the Vega graphics were again coming out far ahead, with a large 108% lead in average
frame rate when compared to the Intel CPU. Unfortunately I haven’t been able to properly
test gaming differences here using discrete graphics. My 8300H laptop has a GTX 1060,
while my 3750H laptop has a GTX 1660 Ti. It would be nice if I could get a 8300H laptop
with the 1660 Ti, but that seems unlikely, as the Intel 9th gen CPUs came out around
the same time I don’t think there would be any. Even if they are, I don’t have any
available to test with at the moment. With that said, I might compare these two machines
in gaming in a future video if there’s enough interest, let me know, but for the purposes
of this CPU comparison it doesn’t make sense. I also haven’t been able to test differences
like thermals, as both laptops have entirely different cooling solutions I can’t do an
apples to apples comparison there, however you can see the temperatures in my full review
videos linked in the description. Under heavy load, I did have note my 8300H system was
running hotter while the 3750H ran noticeably cooler, but yeah it will really depend on
the specific laptop and workload. This is what I’d expect, the Intel chips likely
run hotter with their higher TDP, more power equals more heat. As for price difference, it’s a little hard
to compare. The 8300H was released in Q2 2018, while the 3750H was released in Q1 2019. The
8300H has already been replaced by the 9300H in Q2 2019, so I haven’t been able to find
good examples of the same laptop with just different CPUs. Not only that, but there are
also GPU differences to account for which further affect prices, so unfortunately I
don’t have good examples. Based purely on a meeting I had with a laptop
company at Computex, Intel CPUs do cost them more money to buy, which is likely why we’re
starting to see these AMD chips enter more budget friendly mid range machines. It’s
no secret that AMD’s current Radeon offerings for laptops are lacking, so it’s not surprising
we’re starting to see hybrid options like the FX505DU with AMD CPU and Nvidia GPU. Yes,
as we saw in my ASUS FX505DU game benchmarks, the 1% lows are lower compared to Intel options
as the CPU is weaker, however when it came down to it the averages were still good and
all games were playable at higher settings, which I think matters more than numbers on
the graph. So while the 8300H is in general a superior
CPU, it has a higher TDP, so uses more power, likely runs warmer and possibly costs more
money. The 3750H is quite capable, and if it gives us lower cost machines then it’s
good to have that option available, but personally I’m hoping AMD’s success on the desktop
side starts trickling over to the laptop side more in the future, as having more options
available benefits everyone. As for what you should choose, it seems to
depend on the specific workload. For example, video editors using Adobe Premiere would see
very nice benefits with the Intel CPU, especially if using quick sync when exporting. If the
laptop has no discrete Nvidia or AMD graphics then the Vega GPU in the 3750H is going to
give a much better experience than the Intel 8300H in gaming, and the Ryzen chip may also
see better battery life, but in terms of raw performance in most applications the 8300H
is the clear winner. Let me know which of these CPUs you’d pick
in your next laptop and why down in the comments, and if you’re new to the channel get subscribed
for future comparisons and tech videos like this one.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel i5-8300H CPU Comparison
Tagged on:                                                         

100 thoughts on “AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel i5-8300H CPU Comparison

  • June 15, 2019 at 3:40 am
    Permalink

    A couple of things I wanted to address from the comments:

    1) I do not believe Windows 1903 would have helped Ryzen performance here. The updates improve topology awareness in Windows, however the 3750H has a single CCX so this should not make any difference (it will of course be another story on the desktop side, though at the moment the Windows update alone does not improve this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XMWS0_9gNo).
    2) The FX505DU in the video shows single channel in the memory, don't worry, I replaced it with dual channel after I filmed it all, it just came like that to me. I've tested 15 games with both single and dual channel memory for a future comparison.

    Reply
  • June 16, 2019 at 9:32 pm
    Permalink

    It's like you have two voices.

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 4:07 am
    Permalink

    Ryzen are better if you are building a pc and intel processor are better in laptops

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 8:43 am
    Permalink

    Sorry but i don't agree with 14nm vs 12nm explanantion for intel's higher power usage because intel's 14nm++ process are as good as TSMC's 12nm, the i5 have higher power consumption because Intel choosed to puch their architecture to their limit just to still on top, and radeon Vega has the same feature to intel's quicksync called VCE, this feature exists since kaveri era

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 12:04 pm
    Permalink

    Been trying to figure out if you really need a i7 for gaming, or if youre alright with a i5. Laptops that is.

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 4:21 pm
    Permalink

    I cannot seem to find info about the Ryzen 7 2700U. Do you happen to know if it is superior to the i5-8300H?

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 4:22 pm
    Permalink

    4MB Cache vs 8MB Cache LOL

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 4:33 pm
    Permalink

    can you review your y540, thanks a bunch, I believe many people would love to see it as there have not been any reviews available elsewhere

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 4:39 pm
    Permalink

    R7 picking up from i5 … What a shame

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 6:04 pm
    Permalink

    Great Video ! btw im buying new laptop this month , should i get asus tuf fx505ge with i7 8750h & 1050ti or asus tuf fx505dt with ryzen 7 3750H & gtx 1650 ? or do you have any laptop recommendations with similiar spec ? thankyou !

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 9:58 pm
    Permalink

    gamiing laptop at this CPU range usually has dedicated GPU, so……

    Reply
  • June 17, 2019 at 10:03 pm
    Permalink

    DDR4 2400 vs 2666…

    Reply
  • June 18, 2019 at 12:52 am
    Permalink

    Hi AMD here. We are using 7nm architecture but yet we have no idea how to increase the cache for our CPUs. OOPS.

    Reply
  • June 18, 2019 at 2:28 am
    Permalink

    Huh. AMD using their highest branding for what is essentially their lowest end parts, weird. Shooting themselves in the foot with 4MB of cache. Even the 2200G has more than that.

    Reply
  • June 18, 2019 at 2:55 am
    Permalink

    Too bad they didnt use the faster RAM for the Ryzen system. Would have made a bit of a difference.

    Reply
  • June 18, 2019 at 3:03 am
    Permalink

    See, this is why the 10nm Intel CPUs wont IMO be able to take much wind out of the AMD Zen 2 sails. They are good CPUs, but are gonna cost more core for core and clock for clock, IPC considered. After all thw issues and low yields and AMDs high yields and tendancy to lower prices over time on everything, AMD is really making the consumer CPU space, laptop and otherwise, super interesting. And as Navi/rDNA matures, the GPU space as well, if for nothing other than competition. Thats why they get my wallet-vote 😉

    Reply
  • June 18, 2019 at 10:58 am
    Permalink

    Anyway you could limit TDP to 35W and RAM speed to 2400 MHz on that intel laptop to make an apples to apples comparison?

    Reply
  • June 18, 2019 at 1:16 pm
    Permalink

    Please tell me which one is better AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 OR Intel Core i5-8300H with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050Ti

    Reply
  • June 19, 2019 at 5:27 am
    Permalink

    Hi jarrod ,How about i7 8750h + gtx 1060 vs r7 3750h + gtx 1660ti for gaming ?

    Reply
  • June 19, 2019 at 6:50 am
    Permalink

    I5 8300h gtx 1050ti vs ryzen 7 3750h gtx 1650. Which one is better to play battlefield 5 ?

    Reply
  • June 19, 2019 at 8:07 am
    Permalink

    How about chrome?

    Reply
  • June 19, 2019 at 5:51 pm
    Permalink

    Before I watch the video I'm going to guess that the i5 is a little better than the ryzen 7 mobile. I have been getting a lot of questions lately about mobile processors and I have been telling a lot of my customers to go with Intel powered laptops. Many laptops that I see for repair are Ryzen mobile. They seem buggy and drivers are a tough get for regular users. Maybe in the future Ryzen 3000 will change that. BTW I am not on the blue team either. I love my Ryzen 5 2600 machine , and never turn on my i7 machines anymore.

    Reply
  • June 19, 2019 at 7:06 pm
    Permalink

    Lately I'm seeing a lot of people who used to bash on AMD are now bashing on Intel. Bandwagons should just go away and respect each other.

    Reply
  • June 20, 2019 at 6:25 am
    Permalink

    Amd Are fast but … it so easy to be defective no point

    Reply
  • June 20, 2019 at 12:34 pm
    Permalink

    3:08 not sure about that. i'm doing a stabilizer right now, uses four cores equally.

    Reply
  • June 20, 2019 at 1:40 pm
    Permalink

    Not saying AMD lost here but they should have 6 core or more in the next generation.

    Reply
  • June 20, 2019 at 1:41 pm
    Permalink

    I would like to see a comparison on Laptop having 1650 but one with 8300H and another with 3750H if possible this will should how much is the CPU affecting the performance.

    Reply
  • June 21, 2019 at 1:18 am
    Permalink

    how much does it difference percentage between ryzen 7 3750h and ryzen 5 3350h , thanks.

    Reply
  • June 21, 2019 at 8:47 am
    Permalink

    I would like to see a comparison between the new i5 9300h and i7 9750h. I am planning on buying a laptop with a gtx 1660ti for school but mostly gaming. I want to have smooth gameplay also for game like the new call of duty or cyberpunk so I would like to know which processor is worth it with the gtx 1660ti without too much heating problems.

    Reply
  • June 21, 2019 at 11:06 am
    Permalink

    Intel wins

    Reply
  • June 22, 2019 at 9:34 am
    Permalink

    for the power consumption it would really be necessary to know the whole platform. I have seen skylake Laptops that had significantly higher powerdraw in comparison to similar priced/specd Ryzen Laptop only to then see that when the inbuilt display is not used (shut off and external monitor) the situation reversed.
    even just different memory, SSD and wifi configurations can make a difference of 10W.

    Reply
  • June 22, 2019 at 12:48 pm
    Permalink

    How big is the increase of CPU performance that has been overclock

    Reply
  • June 22, 2019 at 1:35 pm
    Permalink

    I'm currently looking to buy a new laptop and the i5-8300h is really common in gaming laptops. I think if I can find one for a good price used I will get one.

    Reply
  • June 23, 2019 at 1:14 pm
    Permalink

    If you need cool slim nice 4(8) core laptop you choose 2500U/2700U/3500U/3700U. If you want gaming powerful laptop you choose 6-core Intel 8xxxH. I have no idea why anyone would need a 3750H or 8300H laptop. They are just stupid.

    Reply
  • June 24, 2019 at 10:20 am
    Permalink

    Great video man, this comparison is what i looking for lately. You got new sub man!

    Reply
  • June 25, 2019 at 7:17 am
    Permalink

    Time and efforts are clear, thank you.

    Reply
  • June 26, 2019 at 2:26 pm
    Permalink

    Fx tuf505g vs fx tuf505d

    Reply
  • June 27, 2019 at 2:59 pm
    Permalink

    So the simple conclusion is:
    1. If you buying a laptop for content creation, go for a laptop with Intel i5-8300H,
    2. If you buying a laptop for gaming and multi-tasking productivity, go for a laptop with Ryzen 7-3750H
    cheers 😉

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 7:59 am
    Permalink

    You really do sound like you are reading off a script…

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 11:18 am
    Permalink

    AMD Ryzen 5 3550H rx 560x or i5 7300hq gtx 1050 ti?

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 12:08 pm
    Permalink

    I would glady sacrifice some cpu performance for an actual GPU with multiple fold of performance. The intel HD is garbage and always will be. 10watts is HUGE is huge for mobile. It's 33% less power hungry.

    Reply
  • June 28, 2019 at 4:32 pm
    Permalink

    I loved your comparison cuz you compared with all necessary softwares.

    Reply
  • June 29, 2019 at 2:53 am
    Permalink

    Does intel-8300h works better in other editing app than r7-3750h too?
    And does r7-3750h works well in basis like photoshop/illustrsting/web broswsing/microsoft word compared to intel?

    Reply
  • June 30, 2019 at 2:02 am
    Permalink

    Intel consumes about 10w more just to increase the clock speed from 3.8ghz to 4ghz , the 10% performance increase seems to come from the expense of power consumption.

    Reply
  • July 1, 2019 at 12:41 am
    Permalink

    So in gaming,the 3750h with 1660ti could easily beat the i5 8300h with 1060 right?can you make a video compare fps between them

    Reply
  • July 1, 2019 at 5:17 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Jarrod, I found your videos to be very helpful. At the moment, I have to choose between the Asus FX505DU and the Asus FX505GM (i5 8300 and nvidia GTX 1060). Considering I'm only interested in gaming, which one would you choose if the price difference is immaterial? (about £50 difference). Thanks!

    Reply
  • July 2, 2019 at 6:06 am
    Permalink

    Cache is so important!

    Reply
  • July 3, 2019 at 2:11 am
    Permalink

    Which one should I choose for design and programming ??

    Reply
  • July 3, 2019 at 5:17 am
    Permalink

    Thanks jarod, your video really help me much. Now im gonna pick 505DU for budget gaming laptop, keep up the good work man.

    Reply
  • July 4, 2019 at 5:37 pm
    Permalink

    I need a laptop for school and need to run Adobe premiere pro will the amd 3750h work for it or no?

    Reply
  • July 5, 2019 at 7:48 am
    Permalink

    wow…

    Reply
  • July 9, 2019 at 2:36 am
    Permalink

    AMD ryzen 7 3750h has 6mb cache please look over it

    Reply
  • July 18, 2019 at 9:14 am
    Permalink

    I was decided to go AMD until Intel released the 9th gen. So AMD Ryzen 3750H vs i5-9300H???

    Reply
  • July 21, 2019 at 3:13 pm
    Permalink

    AMD is getting there. Finally starting to see more competitive products lately. I hope AMD can push Intel to hit more agressive price points.

    Reply
  • July 21, 2019 at 10:17 pm
    Permalink

    The ASUS Strix G GL531GU-WB53 model sold at Walmart has the Intel i5-9300H and GTX 1660 TI for $999 (was $899 last week during Prime Week), but you'll need to add another 8GB stick of RAM for an apples to apples comparison as it only comes with 8GB (1X8 configuration I believe): https://www.walmart.com/ip/Laptop-4-1GHz-NVIDIA-i5-9300H-RAM-GTX-ASUS-Intel-Turbo-GeForce-8GB-1660Ti-Core-6GB-GDDR6-15-6-PCIE-ROG-SSD-512GB-2-4GHz-STRIX-GL531GU-WB53/665853169?wmlspartner=wlpa&selectedSellerId=0&adid=22222222227292522581&wl0=&wl1=g&wl2=t&wl3=354384866156&wl4=pla-760527489980&wl5=9029010&wl6=&wl7=&wl8=&wl9=pla&wl10=8175035&wl11=online&wl12=665853169&veh=sem&gclid=CjwKCAjwmtDpBRAQEiwAC6lm41L8RH26ihto7BSntOkWDZSY_7chbqI71nXfW2FPXyPCw4NijS9QdhoC9kYQAvD_BwE

    Reply
  • July 25, 2019 at 11:18 am
    Permalink

    Wait so with the R7-3750H am I bette off with the GTX 1060ti or Radeon RX Vega 10?

    Reply
  • July 27, 2019 at 5:42 am
    Permalink

    hey jarrod, i recently bought ram for my laptop but the advertised frequency is not what it shows on cpu-z, showing a slightly less clocked ram. Is it possible to use the xmp profile on a laptop?

    Reply
  • July 27, 2019 at 11:28 am
    Permalink

    Fx505du and fx505gm. What better?

    Reply
  • July 28, 2019 at 12:40 pm
    Permalink

    И который лучше в итоге??

    Reply
  • August 1, 2019 at 7:39 am
    Permalink

    Is the i5 9300h with 1650 comparable to Ryzen 7 3750h with 1650 and 120 htz monitor ? (At least for gaming).

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 9:04 am
    Permalink

    limit the 8300 to 35 watts pretty sure we will see a huge difference in a laptop environment 10 watts is a massive performance difference but it matters little when I can buy the Asus tuf505 with a 1660ti which is at this time the best value for money gaming laptop good luck finding a 8300 system to compare.

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 10:59 am
    Permalink

    Bro, what video editing software use GPU for rendering?

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 7:16 pm
    Permalink

    is the 3750h using dual channel?

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 3:27 pm
    Permalink

    How would the same Lenovo laptop be but… with a RTX 2060?

    Reply
  • August 13, 2019 at 10:50 am
    Permalink

    i am confused here. shouldnt u be comparing intel i5 with ryzen 5…?

    Reply
  • August 16, 2019 at 4:36 pm
    Permalink

    Amd is not good in mobile processor

    Reply
  • August 18, 2019 at 2:51 pm
    Permalink

    So in laptops ryzen is better for gaming and intel is better for work 😅

    Reply
  • August 19, 2019 at 7:09 pm
    Permalink

    You can easily test these 2 laptops in gaming by putting everything on low… the GPU doesnt matter in that case because the system runs into the CPU limit.
    I am pretty sure that the Intel i5 even wins with the inferior GTX 1060…

    Reply
  • August 21, 2019 at 1:36 am
    Permalink

    What should i choose : AMD Ryzen 7-3750H and GTX 1660Ti 6GB vs i7-8750H and GTX 1050 4GB. My main use is gaming and game development(unreal engine 4). I've been considering about this for a week @@

    Reply
  • August 22, 2019 at 10:16 am
    Permalink

    Hi Jarrod,

    I'm trying to configure a ZBook Studio X360 with one of the 16 available CPU-GPU combinations (see below). The laptop will have a 4k screen (which I know you are not a fan of..), but I'm also no gamer 😉 Predominant use cases: 80% browsing and youtube with a lot of tabs over, 20% photo and video editing.

    Time and time again the i5s perform rather well in your tests and since I very much do prefer a cool laptop over an insanely fast one (that runs hot and makes a lot of noise), would you say for my use case the i5-8300 + P1000 is the recommended of below options? Or might it not be strong enough for video editing on a 4k screen..?

    Overall, which of below options would you recommend given the above use case and preference for good thermals over speed? Perhaps the P1000+i7-8750, but then undervolting the latter?

    Any and all thoughts would be extremely appreciated..!

    1. HP IDS DSC P1000 4GB i5-8300H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    2. HP IDS DSC P1000 4GB i5-8400H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    3. HP IDS DSC P1000 4GB i7-8750H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    4. HP IDS DSC P1000 4GB i7-8850H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    5. HP IDS DSC E-2176M Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    6. HP IDS DSC P1000 4GB E-2186M Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    7. HP IDS UMA i5-8300H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    8. HP IDS UMA i5-8400H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    9. HP IDS UMA i7-8750H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    10. HP IDS UMA i7-8850H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    11. HP IDS DSC P1000 4GB i9-8950HK Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    12. HP IDS DSC P2000 4GB E-2176M Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    13. HP IDS DSC P2000 4GB E-2186M Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    14. HP IDS DSC P2000 4GB i7-8750H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    15. HP IDS DSC P2000 4GB i7-8850H Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC
    16. HP IDS DSC P2000 4GB i9-8950HK Studiox360 G5 Base NB PC

    Reply
  • August 23, 2019 at 1:56 am
    Permalink

    I am currently trying to decide which one of these Laptops i should get. I get a free backpack with the Y530 which is also cheaper than the Asus one. But i am looking for maximum performance in games while handling Sony Vegas Pro for heavy editing. Can anyone please help?

    Reply
  • August 26, 2019 at 3:10 pm
    Permalink

    amd gpu win any way loking for beter one

    Reply
  • August 26, 2019 at 7:39 pm
    Permalink

    When are mobile versions of 3700x and Navi coming to laptops?

    Reply
  • August 29, 2019 at 11:27 pm
    Permalink

    Yeah but those apu scores tho.

    Reply
  • August 31, 2019 at 1:34 am
    Permalink

    Ryzen 7 3750H vs i5 9300H…who will win?

    Reply
  • August 31, 2019 at 4:48 pm
    Permalink

    was the ryzen in dual channel?

    Reply
  • September 1, 2019 at 2:10 pm
    Permalink

    ryzen 7 3750H vs i5 9300H?

    Reply
  • September 2, 2019 at 12:59 am
    Permalink

    Hey Jarrod what do you think I should buy?
    AN515-54-51M5 or FX505DT-AL271T, they are both around $900 in my country

    Reply
  • September 2, 2019 at 1:55 pm
    Permalink

    Which is better Asus tuf gaming fx505dd ryzen 5 8gb ram or Lenovo Legion y540 i5 8gb ram?

    Reply
  • September 3, 2019 at 10:50 am
    Permalink

    Msi gl63 8rcs(Intel i5-8300H) or Asus tuf fx505d(ryzen 5 3550H) better?

    Reply
  • September 4, 2019 at 3:43 am
    Permalink

    Thank you for the review…

    Reply
  • September 5, 2019 at 1:44 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Jarrod if you are about to choose which is better AMD or Intel for laptop?? Anyone?? Please help me decide..

    Reply
  • September 5, 2019 at 11:47 pm
    Permalink

    hi jarrod see this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HaLHeWEstY this guy use many takes of this video, the tittle of the videos is LAPTOP BATTLE : RYZEN 7 3750H vs CORE i5 8300H and the user is Haru Tehkno

    Reply
  • September 6, 2019 at 4:56 pm
    Permalink

    Informative, but voice is so annoying it makes it hard to concentrate..

    Reply
  • September 7, 2019 at 4:12 pm
    Permalink

    really theyd make a ryzen deskrop cpu laptop already intel ones suck ass

    Reply
  • September 10, 2019 at 1:53 pm
    Permalink

    Ryzen 7 has 6M of total cache memory – 4M L3 and 2M L2. I did not find Intel specifying on what the 8M cache type is or how it is divided between L2/L3 but it won't be right to see Ryzen 7 has a 4M Cache CPU

    Reply
  • September 11, 2019 at 12:41 am
    Permalink

    Ryzen need RAM with speed over 2800

    Reply
  • September 11, 2019 at 2:16 pm
    Permalink

    Please help should i get ryzen 7 3750h and rtx 2060 laptop
    Will ryzen 7 bottleneck rtx 2060?

    Reply
  • September 11, 2019 at 5:19 pm
    Permalink

    You should test gaming

    Reply
  • September 14, 2019 at 5:44 am
    Permalink

    the i5 is beating a ryzen 7 3700 series wow

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 12:58 pm
    Permalink

    i know this is an old video, but what about the rendering time on after effects?

    Reply
  • September 20, 2019 at 4:49 pm
    Permalink

    Which is better in design programs like etabs and Autodesk Revit and 3dmax .. ryzen 7-3750h or Intel core i7-9750h ?

    Reply
  • September 20, 2019 at 10:47 pm
    Permalink

    Ryzen 7 with 1660ti or i5 with 1060 6gb?

    Reply
  • September 22, 2019 at 2:43 pm
    Permalink

    AMD for years!

    Reply
  • September 23, 2019 at 2:52 am
    Permalink

    I should I get a Ryzen 7 Asus or a i7 Lenovo

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 3:35 am
    Permalink

    This review is quite interesting. I am shopping around a laptop for video editing, and will mainly use Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects and intend to try out DaVinci Resolve – which seems to utilize the GPU more than Adobe. I am in Indonesia and the prices are similar to the ones in Australia.
    The three computers I am eyeing are the Asus TUF FX505DV, the Acer Nitro 5 and the Acer Helios 300. I am looking for the best price/performance bang for my buck. Know all this, would you recommend one of these more than the others?

    Reply
  • October 10, 2019 at 4:20 am
    Permalink

    Precessor: AMD dual core E2-9000
    Ram: 4 GB DDR4
    Storage: 1TB
    ??Can this laptop run MS office and internet **without any problem?

    Reply
  • October 12, 2019 at 11:43 pm
    Permalink

    So in this video you said that amd 3750h can only support ddr4-2400 memory. I found a laptop i want to buy, which is asus tuf fx705du with gtx 1660 ti and 16gb of ram, with amd 3750h of course. Description of this laptop says that memory in it is 2666 Mhz 2x8gb. Cpu's cache is listed at 6mb, in your video its 4mb. Are they lying, or you made a mistake? I hope someone can answer this question for me, i want to get this laptop soon.

    Reply
  • October 16, 2019 at 7:36 pm
    Permalink

    anyone know if asus tuf 505dt ryzen 7 3750 h is better or acer nitro 7 i5 9th gen 60htrz is better? please reply?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *